Tax Guide

Your Client Deducted TDS Under the Wrong Section

The section is your client's compliance decision, not your filing constraint. But the lower rate that comes with the wrong one lands on you as advance tax.

On this page

You opened your Form 26AS expecting to see 194J against your client’s name, and it says 194C. Or the reverse. Or a section you have never heard of. The amount looks wrong too — too little, usually — and now you are trying to work out whether this is a mistake you have to fix, a mistake your client has to fix, or a problem that will surface when you file.

The short answer: the section is almost never yours to fix, the credit you can claim is the amount actually deducted regardless of which section it sits under, and the person carrying the risk of a wrong classification is your client, not you. The longer answer is worth reading, because there is one version of this that costs you real money.

What decides the TDS section: 194J or 194C

Not your job title. Not what your invoice says. Not what your client’s accounts software defaults to. The section is decided by the nature of the service you supplied, which is why two people with the same designation can correctly sit under different sections for different pieces of work.

SectionCoversRateThreshold
194JProfessional services and fees for technical services — design, development, consulting, legal, medical, accountancy, engineering10% (professional) / 2% (technical services)Rs. 50,000 per financial year per deductor (raised from Rs. 30,000 in Budget 2025; effective 1 April 2025).
194CWork contracts — operational or executional work carried out to a specification (data processing, transcription, production, assembly)1% (individual/HUF) / 2% (company, firm, AOP)Rs. 30,000 per single transaction, or Rs. 1,00,000 aggregate per financial year per deductor.
194-OPayments routed through an e-commerce operator — the marketplace deducts, not the end client0.1%Rs. 5,00,000 per financial year per deductee (individual/HUF only; no threshold for other entities).

The distinction that produces most of these mismatches is 194J against 194C, and it is a real distinction rather than a formality. Professional services under 194J involve the application of specialised skill and judgement. A work contract under 194C is the execution of a defined job. Writing a technical architecture is the first; typing up a transcript is the second. Where the same engagement contains both, the substance of what was mainly supplied governs.

Does the wrong section cost you anything?

Separate two things that get confused constantly.

Your TDS credit: unaffected

Credit under Section 199 read with Rule 37BA follows the deductor’s statement. Whatever amount your client reported against your PAN is the amount you can claim, and the section label on it does not reduce it. If they deducted and reported Rs. 1,000 under 194C, you claim Rs. 1,000.

Your income treatment: unaffected

The section your client chose does not decide how you report the income. Whether your receipts are eligible for presumptive taxation under Section 44ADA depends on the profession you carry on, not on the TDS section a third party selected. A 194C label on your 26AS does not disqualify you from 44ADA, and a 194J label does not qualify you for it.

The section is your client’s compliance decision. It records what they thought they were buying, not what you are allowed to file.

Your tax bill: this is the part that can cost you

Here is the real exposure, and it is not about the section at all — it is about the amount. A lower rate means less tax collected during the year against income you still owe tax on. The shortfall does not disappear; it lands on you as advance tax or self-assessment tax, and if you did not plan for it, as interest under Sections 234B and 234C on top.

So the practical harm of a wrong section is a cashflow surprise you did not budget for. If several clients have under-deducted across a year, that can be a large number arriving at once.

Free · no loginEnter the payment and the correct section to see the deduction that should have happened — then check the gap against what your clients actually withheld.

Who is liable when the deductor uses the wrong section

Your client’s, and more seriously than most of them realise. A deductor who deducts under the wrong section and therefore deducts short is treated as an assessee in default for the shortfall under Section 201(1), and owes interest on it under Section 201(1A) for every month from the date the tax was deductible to the date it is actually paid. There is also a potential disallowance of a portion of the expense in their own computation.

This matters tactically. When you write to a client about a wrong section, you are not asking a favour — you are flagging an exposure that grows monthly and that they would rather fix quietly now than have surface in a TDS assessment later. Say so plainly.

What to ask the deductor to correct

The remedy is a correction statement — a revised Form 26Q under Rule 31A for the affected quarter, restating the deduction under the right section. If the deduction was also short, the shortfall has to be deposited before it can be reported.

Be specific about which quarter. Form 26Q filings run to fixed dates — 31 July for April-June, 31 October for July-September, 31 January for October-December and 31 May for January-March — and a correction has to name the quarter it revises. A letter that says "please fix my TDS" gets filed under someone’s pending tray; a letter that says "revise the Q2 Form 26Q to report this deduction under 194J" gets actioned.

Generated from your own numbersOne letter per deductor, citing the provisions that oblige them, itemising the quarters and amounts in dispute, and asking for the correction by a stated date. Your letter, not a HourSlip mailshot.

The one case where the rate is not a mistake

If your 26AS shows 20% and you were expecting 10% (professional) / 2% (technical services), the section is probably fine and the cause is Section 206AA — tax deducted at the higher rate because a valid PAN was not on file with the deductor when the deduction was made. Fixing this forward is a two-minute job (send them your PAN); recovering the excess for a past quarter means a correction statement, same as everything else on this page.

The section is only one of the things that goes wrong with a deduction. The overview of what a client’s TDS deduction means covers the rest — missing entries, mismatched certificates, and the interest that follows when too little was withheld.

FAQ

My 26AS says 194C but I am a designer. Is my ITR wrong?
No. The TDS section your client selected does not determine how you report your income or whether you can use Section 44ADA — that turns on the profession you actually carry on. Claim the credit for the amount reported against your PAN and report your receipts correctly. The mismatch in labels is your client’s compliance record, not yours.
Can I file a correction myself?
No. Only the deductor can revise the quarterly statement that assigns tax to your PAN. Credit is given under Section 199 read with Rule 37BA on the basis of that statement, which is why every remedy on this page runs through the client rather than around them.
My client under-deducted. Do I owe the difference?
You owe tax on your income regardless of how much was withheld — so yes, the shortfall lands on you as advance tax or self-assessment tax, with possible interest under Sections 234B and 234C. Separately, the deductor is treated as in default for the shortfall under Section 201(1) and owes interest under Section 201(1A). Both things are true at once; they are different liabilities.
What if the client refuses to correct it?
If the amount is right and only the section is wrong, it is usually not worth pursuing. If the amount is short, raise a grievance against the deductor on the e-filing portal with your invoice and Form 16A as evidence, and put the Section 201(1A) exposure in writing to them first — most accounts teams would rather file a correction than carry accruing interest.
Does this change under the Income-tax Act 2025?
The labels do. For amounts your client paid or credited on or after 1 April 2026 (whichever happened first), deductions cite Section 393(1) with a Table Sl. No. reference — professional fees at Sl. 6(iii).D(b), contractor at Sl. 6(i) — instead of 194J and 194C. Rates and thresholds are unchanged, and no 4-digit payment code has been notified despite what several widely-read blogs assert.

Every deduction, caught

Manage your freelance finances in one place.

HourSlip handles invoicing, GSTR-1 export, and TDS reconciliation — free to start.

Start free →

What is due next

⚑ Next deadline67 days away

15 December · 2026Statutory

Look up the details

This guide is general information, not tax advice. Rates and dates are for FY 2026–27 and can change. Verify with your CA before you file.

HourSlip

We build GST invoicing and tax tooling for India’s independent services professionals. Every guide is written against the Act, the Rules and the CBDT/CBIC circulars, and cites its sources.

15 December is closer than you think

Stop losing rupees to unclaimed TDS.

Every invoice logged, every deduction matched to 26AS, your CA handed a reconciled year — not a folder of PDFs.

• No card required• Export your data as CSV